12/01/26

41

A recent report by the Cato Institute highlights significant concerns regarding the practice of debanking within the United States, emphasizing that the majority of such cases are driven primarily by governmental pressure rather than bank policies. The analysis points to a pattern where federal authorities influence financial institutions to close accounts, especially those affiliated with certain political or religious groups, or in relation to digital assets and cryptocurrencies.

The report delineates several types of debanking. Religious or political debanking involves the termination of accounts based on the customer’s beliefs or affiliations. Operational reasons pertain to banks closing accounts that are deemed no longer beneficial to their interests. Most concerning, however, is government-led debanking, where official intervention — either directly through court orders or indirectly via regulatory pressures — ultimately results in account closures. The study suggests such actions are often initiated by government entities instructing banks on operational decisions.

The report further explains that government debanking manifests in two ways: direct actions, such as official letters or court directives ordering specific account closures, and indirect measures through legislation or regulations that compel financial institutions to cease serving particular customers or sectors. For instance, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has issued instructions to banks to limit or cease dealings with cryptocurrency firms, frequently without clear timelines or follow-up, which effectively amounts to enforced account termination.

High-profile cases include JPMorgan Chase’s alleged unwillingness to explain account closures of digital asset industry participants. While some executives deny that political or ideological bias influences such decisions, critics argue that government policies and regulatory frameworks significantly contribute to the prevalence of debanking.

Recommendations to address this systemic issue include comprehensive reforms to the Bank Secrecy Act, the repeal of confidentiality laws, and the removal of reputational risk regulation. Such measures could diminish government influence, increase transparency, and prevent financial institutions from serving as agents of regulatory enforcement rather than independent service providers. Addressing these issues is viewed as essential for ensuring fair and open access to banking services, particularly for innovative sectors like digital assets.